Our 2005 Reviewers

Thanks to Our Peer-Reviewers in 2016

Being on the right path

Being on the right pathThe 1st issue of the Iranian Journal of Radiation Research (IJRR) was published two years ago (June 2003). This journal was initiated to bring together the various disciplines of radiation oncology, radiation biology, medical physics, nuclear medicine and other related subjects to intensify the dialogue between basic and clinical researchers especially those working in Ir...

Computer Recognizes Expert Reviewers

I n this last issue of Computer in 2005, I would like to extend my gratitude to the dedicated reviewers whose efforts make possible each issue of Computer. We rely on and highly value the peer review process and the reviewers who are at its very core. Our reviewers contribute by reviewing papers as assigned in their technical area of expertise. They often comment on organization and clarity, qu...

Migraine-anxiety related dizziness (MARD): a new disorder?

L ast year we said goodbye to Ian Whittle whom we thank for all his hard work and welcome Peter Warnke from Liverpool as our new Associate Editor for Neurosurgery. We also say goodbye to many members of the editorial board and welcome new faces. The vitality of the journal rests with its reviewers and authors. We listed our reviewers in the December issue and reiterate our thanks to them. With ...

Optimal Allocation of Proposals to Reviewers to Facilitate Effective Ranking

Peer review of research proposals and articles is an essential element in R&D processes world-wide. Here we consider a problem which, to the best of our knowledge, has not been addressed until now: how to assign subsets of proposals to reviewers in scenarios where the reviewers supply their evaluations through ordinal ranking. The solution approach we propose for this assignment problem maximiz...

Guide for peer reviewers of scientific articles in the Croatian Medical Journal.

Despite its shortcomings, peer review is still the best tool of scientific publishing. It brings benefits not only to the journal and its authors, but to the peer reviewers: they are privileged to have an insight into the latest research and still unpublished results in their scientific field. Reviewers also build up their ability to critically assess scientific papers, which may be useful in t...